The BBC has been shown evidence apparently corroborating reports of a chemical attack in Syria last month.
A BBC correspondent who visited the northern town of Saraqeb was told by eyewitnesses that government helicopters had dropped at least two devices containing poisonous gas.
The government has vehemently denied claims it has used chemical agents.
The US has warned that such a development would be a "red line" for possible intervention.
However, President Barack Obama has said the current intelligence on possible chemical weapon usage did not constitute sufficient proof.
For the past several days reporters have reported from Syria, they have reported, supported by footage that rebels have been firing on Civilians, including woman and children....The Syrian army trying to protect them.
This report from Sky has been going around many news outlets, showing civilians begging for the reporters to tell the truth about Syria and the armed gangs terrorizing and killing them.
And we haven't even mentioned the Cannibalism yet, or the numerous videos showing Syrian Rebels Executing, unarmed, bound prisoners or/and civilians.
I may be wrong, the BBC have not reported on these fact, instead we have another "claim" and "signs" of chemical attack. (but no proof of "WHO" carried out these attacks)
Of course the UN statement from last week, stating that they have increasing evidence that the "rebels" have used chemical weapons is going ignored by all. In addition the severe lack of proof or rather NON, of the Syrian army using chemical weapons was also mentioned during this announcement, of course, also being ignored.